DataSunrise Achieves AWS DevOps Competency Status in AWS DevSecOps and Monitoring, Logging, Performance

Mitigating AI Security Risks

Mitigating AI Security Risks

As generative AI (GenAI) models become integral to modern infrastructure, they bring with them new vectors for security exposure. From hallucinated SQL queries and unintended data leaks to malicious prompt injection, GenAI is reshaping the risk landscape. Traditional security controls often fail to provide sufficient coverage in real-time environments where models make autonomous decisions. This article explores practical strategies for mitigating AI security risks through layered defenses like real-time auditing, dynamic masking, data discovery, and robust compliance enforcement.

Why GenAI Poses Unique Security Challenges

GenAI systems operate on probabilistic logic, which means they can generate unpredictable outputs based on loosely structured prompts. These outputs may include sensitive customer data, PII, or access credentials learned during training or picked up during prompt chaining. Worse, users interacting with GenAI systems might extract unauthorized information if guardrails are not enforced.

Consider a case where a GenAI agent generates SQL queries to analyze customer purchase data. A malicious prompt might trick it into executing the following:

SELECT * FROM customers WHERE ssn IS NOT NULL;

If this query bypasses security rules, it could leak sensitive records. This is why contextual analysis and dynamic controls are critical to preventing abuse.

Another example might involve attempts to enumerate database schema:

SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema = 'public';

This could expose table structures useful for later attacks.

Real-Time Auditing for AI Systems

Real-time auditing is the first line of defense for GenAI deployments. It captures and logs interactions, queries, and resulting actions to identify misuse or policy violations. Audit trails also play a crucial role in forensic analysis and regulatory response.

Tools like DataSunrise's Audit Rule engine allow organizations to define specific triggers for queries initiated via GenAI agents. Combined with database activity monitoring, these logs provide visibility into how models interact with structured and unstructured data sources.

Here’s an example of a logging rule pattern:

WHEN query_text LIKE '%ssn%' THEN log_event;

Dynamic Masking as an AI-Safe Guardrail

One of the most effective ways to prevent sensitive data exposure is to dynamically mask output in real-time. Unlike static masking, which modifies data at rest, dynamic masking operates on-the-fly. This means sensitive fields like credit card numbers, national IDs, or addresses are replaced with placeholder values when accessed through AI-driven interfaces.

DataSunrise supports dynamic masking policies that can be scoped to roles, query context, or application origin. When paired with LLM interfaces, these policies ensure that even if a prompt attempts to access restricted fields, the model only sees masked data.

Example dynamic masking rule:

MASK COLUMN customers.credit_card USING 'XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-####';

Data Discovery for Sensitive AI Access Mapping

Before you can protect data from GenAI misuse, you must know where it resides. Data discovery tools identify and classify sensitive records across databases, data lakes, and file systems. This includes both structured fields (like name and email) and semi-structured patterns (like logs and chat transcripts).

DataSunrise Periodic Data Discovery Settings UI
Screenshot of the DataSunrise interface highlighting periodic data discovery settings, showcasing control over scanning logic, buffer sizes, and file header configurations.

Automated data discovery helps create contextual sensitivity maps that inform access policies and guide model interaction limits. This proactive approach ensures that developers and auditors alike understand what data the AI system could access during runtime.

For example, a simple scan might identify emails via regex:

[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}

Enforcing Security and Compliance

AI security isn’t just about preventing data leaks; it’s also about meeting legal and regulatory standards. Frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS now expect continuous data protection, role-based access control, and auditable logs—requirements that apply equally to AI-driven systems.

Integrating a compliance automation platform ensures real-time tracking and enforcement of these standards across all user interactions, including GenAI sessions. This allows organizations to implement policies like least privilege access, limit sensitive data scope, and ensure downstream traceability.

Sample role restriction:

GRANT SELECT ON orders TO analyst_role;
REVOKE SELECT ON customers FROM analyst_role;

Using automated compliance reporting, security teams can generate audit-ready logs that detail every AI interaction with regulated data, reducing manual effort and human error in security audits.

Combining Measures for Defense-in-Depth

Each of these mechanisms—real-time auditing, masking, discovery, and compliance—provides partial protection. But when combined, they form a layered defense that’s far more resilient. This is especially important in GenAI contexts where no single control can fully predict or prevent risky behavior.

Cloud-Native Security Architecture Diagram
Architecture diagram showing how AWS services like CloudTrail, EC2, RDS, and CodeDeploy interact in a layered security environment suitable for GenAI workloads.

Picture this flow: an LLM prompts a SQL query; the system audits the request, enforces masking on PII fields, filters the data, and logs the interaction. Meanwhile, compliance engines scan for policy violations. This holistic approach mitigates risk without impeding innovation.

External Practices and Future Outlook

In addition to in-platform protections, best practices from cloud vendors like AWS Macie and SecurityHub are evolving to address GenAI concerns. These services integrate with tools like Lake Formation or CloudTrail to monitor sensitive data usage and user behavior in AI workflows.

As AI security evolves, so must the tools we use. The challenge is not just technical—it’s philosophical. How do we secure systems that reason and adapt on their own? It starts with awareness, tooling, and proactive policy design.

Conclusion

GenAI is transforming industries, but it also reshapes the threat landscape. Mitigating AI security risks requires more than traditional firewalls or user roles—it demands a context-aware, multi-layered strategy. Real-time audits, dynamic masking, data discovery, and automated compliance tools like those from DataSunrise are essential in securing AI-powered infrastructures without stifling their potential.

Next

LLM Security Tools

Learn More

Need Our Support Team Help?

Our experts will be glad to answer your questions.

General information:
[email protected]
Customer Service and Technical Support:
support.datasunrise.com
Partnership and Alliance Inquiries:
[email protected]